“Bride” is lots of fun to watch because it amplifies
all the elements that make the first film so enjoyable. This time, the Creature talks rather than
simply grunting. He makes a friend and
learns to enjoy wine and cigars.
Frankenstein and Pretorius use the same tower where Frankenstein gave life
to his original creation, but it’s now filled with more gadgets that crackle
and pop as Frankenstein adjusts them to imbue life to the Creature’s mate. The Bride herself is probably the best part
of the movie and is yet another horror icon that Whale had a hand in
creating. She shrieks in horror and
cowers behind Frankenstein when she sees the male Creature, and her moves
are a bit robotic as she is just learning how to work her limps. Her most recognizable feature, of course, is
her conical black hair streaked with a white lightning bolt on each side.
Continuing with the Frankenstein theme, I watched
“Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein” on Day 19.
This is the most faithful film adaptation of the novel that I’ve seen,
but it’s still a bit of a misnomer to call it “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Director Kenneth Branagh makes a significant
change to the story by having Victor reanimate his wife, Elizabeth, after the
Creature kills her when Victor refuses to make him a mate. The results are disastrous, of course, and
it’s the movie’s clearest example of Victor’s inability to consider the
consequences of his actions or fully acknowledge and attempt to correct his own
mistakes. His childishness makes him
almost insufferable, but this can’t really be blamed on Branagh as it’s also a
major flaw in Shelley’s novel. I know
that Shelley’s novel is a cautionary tale about hubris and we’re not meant to
like Victor, but I’d prefer him to be a sinister misanthrope rather than a
whiney bitch. Despite its annoying main character, however, there is plenty to like in Branagh’s take on the Frankenstein story, particularly the creation/birth scenes, which were clearly inspired by Whale’s Frankenstein films. Victor sets up a lab in the attic of a boarding house and fills it with a variety of gadgets that emit sparks and bolts of electricity. His exact method for imbuing life to the Creature is never specified, but it relies on a combination of inserting acupuncture needles in key points, stimulating them with electricity from eels, and immersing the Creature’s body in amniotic fluid. Thanks to the movie’s very believable makeup effects, the Creature looks exactly like his body is a composite of several corpses. Throughout the movie, he picks out the stitches that were used to sew him together, and the scars they leave behind are especially realistic.
Shelley’s novel has inspired dozens of film adaptations and “Bride” is one of the best. I can’t say the same about Branagh’s film, but it does contain some very compelling elements that make it well worth watching.
Although it definitely has problems like the ones you mentioned here, I like the Branagh version for the way it treats the creature. The early Frankenstein movies are some of the best horror of the era, but the creature isn't nearly as nuanced or intriguing as in the novel, and most of them completely ignore him as the de facto protagonist.
ReplyDeleteThe scene with the tiny humans in Bride is great, and the special effects are phenomenal for the era.
One of the best scenes in the Branagh version is when the Creature talks to Victor in the ice cave and asks for a companion.
ReplyDeleteThe tiny humans are great. I think that's Vicki's favorite scene.