In celebration of Halloween, my goal is to watch an
average of at least one horror movie per day, blog about each of them, and eat
several boxes of Booberry and Frankenberry.
I started with Kenneth Anger’s silent art house film “Lucifer Rising.” I knew nothing about Anger before watching
the film tonight, and I learned about it from a Metal Hammer interview with the
black metal band Watain. In response to a question about Dimmu Borgir, a more
accessible black metal band that has enjoyed some commercial success, Watain’s
singer compares his band to “Lucifer Rising” and Dimmu Borgir to “Scream,”
claiming that while “Scream” has made more money and has broader appeal “Lucifer
Rising” has more lasting significance.
The movie is essentially a collection of images of
priests and scantily clad, sometimes nude, priestesses walking around ancient
religious sites, mostly in Egypt, but Stonehenge also makes an appearance as
does some site that seems to be in India.
Anger also mixes in shots of various animals, mostly reptiles, including
one of an elephant stepping on a cobra.
As you can probably guess, the film is plotless, and it consists of a
series of symbols that I lack both the will and the patience to decipher. It could have been redeemed, however, if a
winged, forked tongue Satan had actually risen.
Instead, Lucifer seems to be a white guy with an afro in a black jacket
with “Lucifer” painted on it in colorful letters. Or the UFO with “Lucifer” painted on its side
that flies over an Egyptian temple at the end of the film. Thankfully, it’s
only 28 minutes long. I’ll take “Scream”
and Dimmu Borgir; Watain can have “Lucifer Rising.”
No comments:
Post a Comment